Observations: Like Ilford FP4 Plus, Kodak Tri-X 400 offers an excellent range of tonality and contrast with a pleasing but not excessive amount of grain. Compared to slower black and white films, shadow areas can appear a bit dark when exposed for highlights but not excessively so. Those highlights show few if any hot spots like other emulsions can have. I find Tri-X 400 to be a little less forgiving of exposure setting errors than slower film stocks, which is to say that I’m quite impressed—there isn’t a dramatic change in overall exposure from one stop to the next, although slower films like FP4 Plus handle those changes a bit more gracefully. Even when I am shooting without a light meter and I make the wrong choice of exposure time or aperture, I can usually get a usable negative. Like FP4 Plus, I like the look I get with Kodak Tri-X 400 straight out of the scanner. Images don’t require too much postprocessing, and they have that classic traditional look that appeals to me.