Kodak Tri-X 400

Observations: Like Ilford FP4 Plus, Kodak Tri-X 400 offers an excellent range of tonality and contrast with a pleasing but not excessive amount of grain. Compared to slower black and white films, shadow areas can appear a bit dark when exposed for highlights but not excessively so. Those highlights show few if any hot spots like other emulsions can have. I find Tri-X 400 to be a little less forgiving of exposure setting errors than slower film stocks, which is to say that I’m quite impressed—there isn’t a dramatic change in overall exposure from one stop to the next, although slower films like FP4 Plus handle those changes a bit more gracefully. Even when I am shooting without a light meter and I make the wrong choice of exposure time or aperture, I can usually get a usable negative. Like FP4 Plus, I like the look I get with Kodak Tri-X 400 straight out of the scanner. Images don’t require too much postprocessing, and they have that classic traditional look that appeals to me.

Further reading: bluemooncameracodex.com, alexluyckx.com, analog.cafe.

Left: Nikon FM10 with Nikkor 50mm f/2 AI lens, Kodak Tri-X 400 film, 1/250 sec., f/8. I exposed for shadows and, using Paint.NET, pulled highlight brightness back for an overall better balanced image. Right: Nikon FM10 with Nikkor 50mm f/2 AI lens, Kodak Tri-X 400 film, 1/1000 sec., f/11. Kodak Tri-X 400 handled sky brightness very well with a pleasing range of grey tones and without excessive graininess.
Nikon FM10 with Nikkor 35-70mm f/3.5-4.8 zoom lens, Kodak Tri-X 400 film, 1/500 sec., f/8. When exposing for highlights, Kodak Tri-X preserves a good deal (but not a ton) of shadow detail.
Left: Nikon FM10 with Nikkor 50mm f/2 AI lens, Kodak Tri-X 400 film, 1/125 sec., f/2.8. This interior shot demonstrates the wonderful grey tones and contrast that Kodak Tri-X 400 is capable of rendering. Right: Nikon FM10 with Nikkor 35-70mm f/3.5-4.8 zoom lens, Kodak Tri-X 400 film, 1/500 sec., f/4.8. I exposed this shot for highlights. Shadow brightness is a touch darker than what I would have hoped for, but it’s not bad at all.
Left: Nikon F with Nikkor-Q 135mm f/3.5 lens, Kodak Tri-X 400 film, 1/60 sec., f/4. Right: Nikon F with Nikkor-Q 135mm f/3.5 lens, Kodak Tri-X 400 film, 1/500 sec., f/8. I scanned both of these photographs using the SilverFast NegaFix profile for Kodak BW 400CN. They show the gritty contrast that Tri-X can give you.