Kodak Gold 200

Known/rumored respoolings: Fujifilm 200 (per dpreview.com and kosmofoto.com). To be sure, Fujifilm’s consumer-grade color negative films on the market today are not the same as what Fujifilm manufactured into the late 2010s or early 2020s. In 2022, Fujifilm refreshed its packaging for Fujifilm 200 perhaps as a result of its apparent use of a third party, most likely Kodak, to produce that film stock. Although I’m always a little hesitant to believe internet rumors, I think in this case they are true: Fujifilm 200 appears to be rebadged Kodak Gold 200.

Observations: The beauty in shooting a low-priced color film lies in its easy-going nature. When you know your per-frame cost is cheaper than what higher-grade film stocks offer, sometimes the creative juices flow a little better. With Kodak Gold 200, you have the added benefit of a well-performing color negative film stock with good but not overwhelming saturation and decent sharpness. Kodak Gold 200 might have slightly less grain than Kodak Ultramax 400, but in all honesty I have a hard time telling the difference between the two.

Further reading: bluemooncameracodex.com, alexluyckx.com.

Left and right: Nikon F with Nikkor-S 50mm f/1.4 lens, Fujifilm 200 film. Even in spite of its low price point, this film stock is still capable of very pleasing hues.
Left and right: Nikon F with Nikkor-S 50mm f/1.4 lens, Kodak Gold 200 film.